Click here
« « Title Goes Here  •  Home  •  Christian Carnival XCII » »

Oct 19

Which Bible?

Posted by Matt Jones on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.

Bibles

This is a half silly, half serious post. Half silly because it is somewhat ludicrous that I have such a collection of Bibles (I’m a seminary student, its ok, right? RIGHT?) and half serious because I think Bible selection is an important task.

So if you are curious, on with a look at a wide variety of Bible selections (images are clickable)…

Bibles

(l. to r.)

  • The Message: a New Testament and Pslams pocket version of the Eugene Peterson translation.
  • The Promise: Some random King James pocket NT, this was given to me, but not sure why or by who.
  • New Believer’s Bible a NT that people were handing out at UW once, I hoped, and still hope, to give it to a good friend from high school.
  • New American Standard: A pocket NASB that I usually carry with me as the NASB is my preferred translation.
  • New King James: The first pocket Bible I picked up although I am not really impressed by the translation.
  • The Recovery Version: A group was handing this NT out at the UW once, it isn’t a good translation as it has much of Witness Lee’s commentary throughout the text, I’m not really sure why I still have it, I guess I just think it is funny… in a sacrilegious way.
  • Amplified Bible: this is a fairly literal translation that tries to add nuances from the original Greek and Hebrew, it isn’t the best tool, but can be helpful.

    • Bibles

  • UBS4 Greek New Testament: This was given to my Greek class by the Canadian Bible Society, it includes critical apparatus.
  • Nestle-Aland 27 Greek-English New Testament: I picked this up for use in my Biblical Exegesis class as it contains the Greek, English, additional critical apparatus and it also coincides with Metzger’s Textual Commentary.
  • New Revised Standard: This was needed for my New Testament Foundations class and is a solid translation that is good for both study as well as reading aloud.
  • New International Version: This is my “Goodwill” Bible, I forgot my Bible at home when I went on a retreat so I picked this NIV up at Goodwill.
  • New American Standard: this is my first NASB that was given to me by Jae Choi and Daryl Jump in a UCF Core.
  • Today’s New International Version: this was given out at Regent’s Tradition Conference (a few of the Regent College faculty have had a hand in the new translation so I am not too concerned about all the controversy).

    • Bibles

  • Good News Bible: This is my very frist Bible that was given to me by Skyline Presbyterian Church in Tacoma, WA. Okay translation for kids, but not a big fan in general.
  • Today’s New International Version: Some group was handing this NT out at UW a few years back.
  • Abundant Life Bible - New Living Translation: The NLT isn’t a favorite as I usually don’t use paraphrase Bibles but this was given out at Regent by Tyndale to promote it (again, a few of our faculty were involved with this version).
  • New Jerusalem Bible: This was required for a NT class I took at UW, the translation didn’t really jump out at me, included the Apocrypha.
  • NIV Study Bible: This was my first primary Bible used for both study and devotion throughout high school and some of college, still one of my preferred translations. The NIV is also one of the better versions for reading aloud.
  • NASB Study Bible: This is my current primary Bible used mostly in study, but also in devotions. The literal, word-for-word translation is one that I greatly appreciate but makes reading it alound not quite as smooth.
  • The Message: The Prophets was one of Peterson’s first releases after the NT and I really enjoyed his thought-for-thought translations, especially of Isaiah, the imagery and language is extremely vivid. The full version, in my opinion, is a must have for Christians. As I said, I am not a big fan of paraphrases, but I think Peterson (oh, did I mention he is Professor Emeritus at Regent? Heh) did a wonderful job. He has a thorough grasp of the original languages and was able to carry that over in to the English. Of course, I would NEVER recommend using this for study, but it is great for devotional readings or for public readings.

    • Bibles

  • The Comparative Study Bible: This is a useful study tool that contains the NIV, NASB, Amplified, and KJ versions. Parallel Bibles can be quite helpful when trying to get a sense for original meaning and intent as well as seeing where translation issues come up.
  • The Layman’s Parallel Bible: This Parallel Bible was my grandother’s (from 1974) and contains the KJ, Modern Language, Living, and Revised Standard editions.
  • Interlinear NASB/NIV/Greek-English New Testament: Another helpful too to compare my two preferred translations with the original Greek (with literal Greek translation).
  • Interlinear NIV/Hebrew-English Old Testament: Another great study aid to get a feel for the original language, helpful for beginning Hebrew students!

    • See, they all have their purpose… for the most part. :)

    Also, as a guide, IBS has provided a “map” of Bible translations that shows where the different versions fit on a scale from “thought-for-thought” to “word-for-word”

    Bible Translation Chart

    Do I have too many? So what is your favorite and why?
    Ή χάρις του κυρίου ημων Ίησου Χριστου μεθ’ υμων.

    About This Entry -

    Posted by Matt Jones @ 12:20 am on October 19, 2005  •  Filed under: Regent College, Religion
    Permalink: Which Bible?
    You can trackback from your own site and follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 comments feed.

    18 Responses to “Which Bible?”

    Trackbacks & Pings:

    1. O Theophilus.com » Bible versions on 19 Oct 2005 at 1:05 pm Said:

      [...] Matt Jones shows off his bible collection and has a handy little chart that shows bible versions on the word-for-word, thought-for-thought continuum. [...]

    2. Matt Jones’ Random Acts of Verbiage… » Blog Archive » Christian Carnival XCII on 19 Oct 2005 at 2:28 pm Said:

      [...] Which Bible? [...]

    3. Theology and Biblical Studies » Christian Carnival XCII on 19 Oct 2005 at 6:46 pm Said:

      Kramer auto Pingback[...] Lastly in this section, last week’s carnival host Matt Jones gives an analysis of various Bible translations and looks at both the pros and cons. Lots of pictures and exciting diagrams :) Matt also has a very useful archive of all the previous Christian Carnivals here. [...]

    4. Matt Jones’s blog on 04 Apr 2007 at 5:32 pm Said:

      links from Technorati books are a contradiction that the authors of said books don’t want you to pick up on.  It is impossible to do anything on your own.  That fact is proven just in purchasing a book written by someone telling you what to do.) Image from my post: Which Bible?

    5. craigadams49's Blog on 13 Feb 2008 at 7:16 pm Said:

      links from TechnoratiAnd if you don’t want to read you can listen to the Bible on tape! But, whatever you do, let the Word of God through Scripture enrich your life! ? Craig L. Adams Some of the pics in this article were taken fromMatt Jones? Blog.Thats quite a Bible collection he has.

    6. Commonplace Holiness: The Bible  on 23 Aug 2009 at 7:29 pm Said:

      Kramer auto Pingback[...] of the pics in this article were taken from Matt Jones’ Blog. Thats quite a Bible collection he has. [...]

    Comments:

    1. Jongluer Said:

      No you don’t have to many Bibles. You can never have too many Bibles, or any type of Book. In the case of a Bible (or most holy books) is that they’ll always be different, even it’s something like a comma placed somewhere else or a drastically different language/interpretation. I still remember comparing an excerpt on homosexuals from the regular Bible and like some New Age Neo-Con Bible, the original is very peaceful but provides the right message the other one said something along the lines of “God Hates Gay People” It was funny and sad at the same time.
      I don’t have a favorite Bible, and you know why.

      Posted 19 Oct 2005 at 12:03 pm

    2. Mattithyahu Said:

      Biblical translation is a very complex process. Using either the UBS4 or the NA27 (the most accurate original Greek texts) there can either be literal or paraphrase translations. As a translation moves farther and farther away from the original text and intent, it becomes less and less reliable.

      Posted 19 Oct 2005 at 12:59 pm

    3. Lani Said:

      Dude!!! I thought I had heaps of bibles! Haha that’s great!

      I actually did something on this early this year at the Bible College of New Zealand, where I’m currently studying. I use an NRSV for college because it’s gender inclusive and nice and PC. I’m not actually too worried by these things.

      As for my favourite version…
      ummmm I don’t think I have one. I generally use an NIV (because I’ve been using it since forever), a TNIV (because it’s compact and fits anywhere) and an NRSV (for reasons previously stated). I sometimes use the KJV but because it’s a translation of a translation, I’m quite wary of it. I don’t really do paraphrases. I think I’d rather go with the word for word but then paraphrases do have their place.

      I need to learn Greek. Perhaps in my final year…

      Posted 19 Oct 2005 at 9:03 pm

    4. Mattithyahu Said:

      I also have similar reservations about the KJV (as mentioned at O Theophilus). I think the KJV can be good in some situations, but generally translations that aren’t based on the original languages are not the best.

      The NIV seems to be a staple with most people as it is a good mix of “word-for-word” and “thought-for-thought” so it is quite readable while still maintaining a close connection to the original.

      Learning Greek would always be good. I am totally forgetting all that I learned last year. I reall hope to keep up with it although it is difficult when I am tryin to learn Hebrew and have all my other classes! I am good at excuses, eh?

      Posted 19 Oct 2005 at 10:27 pm

    5. JillW Said:

      I think I have almost as many, haven’t counted them. I love my NIV study Bible because I have a lot of favorite passages marked, but I also really like my newer Message/NIV parallel Bible that some relative (:>)) gave me last Christmas.

      Posted 20 Oct 2005 at 8:07 am

    6. Mattithyahu Said:

      Yeah, the same is true with my NIV and NASB study Bibles, so great to have those! I like the idea of the Message/NIV parallel Bible, I think it gives a really good mix. Good selection indeed! :)

      Posted 20 Oct 2005 at 11:20 am

    7. Moose Said:

      Try the “Refromation Study Bible”. Especially if you think the way I may think that you think.
      Moose Pierce
      VA by way of SC by way of CA

      Posted 04 Nov 2005 at 11:30 am

    8. Mattithyahu Said:

      Humm,I haven’t heard of that one, but looks like one to check in to! Thanks!

      Posted 04 Nov 2005 at 12:49 pm

    9. Ehrfurth Said:

      I ran a google search on Bible translations and ran into this blog entry. That’s quite a nice collection of Bible translations!

      NASB is one of my preferred Bible translations as well.

      But how much of the Recovery Version have you actually read? I received a free RcV in Fall 2004 and have read the entire thing almost twice. The translation itself is very close to the NASB and the footnotes are often excellent, pointing to Christ and written from a unique devotional perpective of living the Christian life and enjoying Christ.

      Examples:
      Footnote to Hebrews 12:2:
      http://online.recoveryversion.org/FootNotes.asp?FNtsID=7459

      Footnote to 1 Peter 1:5:
      http://online.recoveryversion.org/FootNotes.asp?FNtsID=7711

      Footnote to Romans 16:1
      http://online.recoveryversion.org/FootNotes.asp?FNtsID=4084

      Also, have you checked out the NET Bible at all since writing this entry?

      Posted 03 Aug 2006 at 3:41 am

    10. Matt Jones Said:

      I haven’t actually read much of the Recovery Version, but what I have read, as you suggest, seems to be a pretty decent translation. What I don’t like at all and what makes me mock this version is the commentary. The footnotes are not footnotes in the sense that the NIV or NAS study Bibles use footnotes. Their footnotes generally try to provide historical context or nuances of the translation. The footnotes in the Recovery Version are commentary. Not only that, but it is commentary written by one person. Commentary should never be placed along side the Bible like that. There are pages where the commentary is 90% of the page. Aside from all that, personally I don’t think the commentary is written very well. It seems to be a lot of fluff and not extremely well written. If Witness Lee wants to have a commentary, that is fine, but leave it out of the Bible. That would be my take on the Recovery Version.

      I am not familiar with the NET. Their website doesn’t seem to mention the use of the NA27, which I would like to see. But overall it appears they have a pretty extensive list of translators and their use of notes to provide insight into why translations were made is a good thing. In the brief look I have had at the translation itself I find it a little too modern for my taste. I think that modern translations can stick to the Greek a bit better, but I suppose if they are looking for a newer NIV type translation, it seemed pretty good.

      Posted 03 Aug 2006 at 12:46 pm

    11. Steve Herr Said:

      Nice selection. Hey, I know you’re ok, because you “prefer” the NASB. I am currently on the home stretch on a small pamphlet I’m writing about the Bible, and found your page while doing a search under “Bibles” for a graphic to put on the cover. Would you mind if I included your comments about the various versions?

      Keep the Faith, Brother.

      Steve

      Posted 17 Apr 2008 at 3:19 pm

    12. Jordan Said:

      Please, can you PM me and tell me few more thinks about this, I am really fan of your blog…

      Posted 05 Mar 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Post a Comment

    Your email is never published nor shared.


    Home Page: Random Acts of Verbiage
    email me!
    Get RSS 2.0 Feed
    Add to Technorati Favorites!
    "The beauty of grace is that it makes life not fair."
    Twitter/Google Friend Connect (Click to Open)