Archive

Archive for February, 2006

John Van Deusen at the EMP

February 7th, 2006 2 comments

This Saturday John Van Deusen and the Lonely Forest will be performing at Seattle’s EMP for their Soundoff semifinals. The Experience Music Project’s Soundoff is a “battle of the bands” type show for musicians under 21. John’s show is this Saturday, the 11th, doors open at 7:00pm, show at 8:00, cost is $10.00 (or $7.00 for students). If you have not heard John before, do so now! He has amazing talent, for any age, with great creativity and a wonderful sound. For some of his music, see his myspace or listen to a few MP3s: 8-6-45, Yossarian, Dresden. Also, I have a large (85 MB) video clip of his Upside Down Tree. I hope you can make it to the show!

EDIT: The show was amazing, John and the Forest won the semifinal and will now be in the final on the EMP main-stage on February 25th.  Please see: John Van Deusen and EMP’s Sound Off.

Sad Superbowl Sunday

February 6th, 2006 4 comments

Well, the Seahawks finally made it to the superbowl, but I don’t get to say the are NFL champions. Why not? Because all the refs were from Pittsburgh. Seriously, I know it is easy to put the blame on anyone but the team, but come on, did you see the game? Apparently the refs didn’t! It is true, Seattle did make mistakes and didn’t play their best game. But the entire game was slanted towards the Steelers. Seattle got penalty after penalty called against them but not the Steelers (even though they were pulling the same stuff). Seattle had 7 penalties for 70 yards, the Steelers had 3 for 20. Yes, 20 yards. There were two extremely poor calls that literally would have reversed the game. One was the “pass interference” call against D. Jack that was clearly not a pass interference. (That’s 4 points more for Seattle – only 4 because there was a fieldgoal scored on that drive that I am replacing by the touchdown) The second was the “touchdown” by the Steelers’ Roethlisberger from 1 yard out. Now, it is somewhat understandable that the play wasn’t overturned because the replays were somewhat inconclusive, but I think it was pretty clear that he did not make it to the enzone. And the lame sliding the football across the goal line was pretty weak. (That’s 7 points less for Steelers) Correct score? Tired 14-14. But Seattle had some amazing momentum going on and I am confident they would have triumphed (had the refs been fair). Ok, enough ranting, they lost, nothing I can do about it. Both Homgren and the the players were class acts and didn’t complain (so I will for them). Good guys them Seahawks. I am looking forward to next year!

On the up side, I did have an awesome weekend hanging out with people. The superbowl was spent at The House (a ministry house owned by friend Greg and Angie DiLoreto, I lived with them the first two years they had it, it was a great experience!) with a bunch of UCFers (past and present) which was way cool. It felt strange going back, it was odd to not know a bunch of the people there! Fun times with old and new friends. Here are a few pictures from the party. Click an image to go to a larger version.

Superbowl Party @ the House!
It wouldn’t be the superbowl with out deep fried … anything!
Superbowl Party @ the House!
Some of the gang getting some grub. Dan Ahn, Angie DiLoreto, Sean Peters, Nathan Bales, Bethany Martin, Ashley Ronnel
Superbowl Party @ the House!
Wishing things were going better… Stacey Dameron, Casey Clevenger, Andy Bauerle
Superbowl Party @ the House!
Having fun watching the referees sell out. Dan Dameron, Stacey Dameron, Casey Clevenger
Superbowl Party @ the House!
The cute couple. Dan and Stacey Dameron
Superbowl Party @ the House!
Greg is not happy!
Superbowl Party @ the House!
Angie expressing her disgust with the way the game is going (and slanted).
Superbowl Party @ the House!
Greg is still not happy.
Superbowl Party @ the House!
One of the tvs was set up on the wall. Note the score… we should have had 7 more, they 7 less… but who I am to whine? Rebecca Miller, Casey Clevenger, Dan Dameron, Angie DiLoreto, Stacey Dameron
Superbowl Party @ the House!
The crowd is not looking happy. Genevieve Sofie, Bethany Martin, Kate Rothgeb, Tammy Suen, Greg DiLoreto

Cheers and Go Seahawks!!
-Matt Jones

Categories: Daily Life, Photoblog

Judges 19

February 2nd, 2006 13 comments

Today in Preaching and Worship class Darrell Johnson tried to tackle at really difficult passage. It was brought up last week when talking about what needs to be expressed when preaching. One of the elements that expository preaching needs to have is the Good News. That doesn’t mean that it has to be about Jesus, but it has to be about the Good News from God. Someone brought up the fact that there are some extremely difficult passages in the Bible to deal with and are often extremely difficult to preach on, let alone see the Good News. There is much more to this discussion, but I will leave it there.

This brings me to Judges 19. This is an example that is extremely difficult to see the Good News in, but as it is in the Bible, it must be dealt with in an appropriate way. It is often easy to just pass over difficult passages by saying “it was a different culture so we don’t have to deal with it like they did.” Often times, we can’t do that. To preach well (and understand the Bible well), original intent must be discovered. As is the case with most places in the Bible, but especially in Old Testament narrative, individual stories MUST be looked at in their larger context, in the metanarrative, the overarching story. This is going to be crucial when looking at a hard passage.

Judges 19:22-20:1 is difficult to read, let alone understand. Please read it prayerfully, slowly, and intently. It makes me cry.

19.22 While they were celebrating, behold, the men of the city, certain worthless fellows, surrounded the house, pounding the door; and they spoke to the owner of the house, the old man, saying, “Bring out the man who came into your house that we may have relations with him.” 23 Then the man, the owner of the house, went out to them and said to them, “No, my fellows, please do not act so wickedly; since this man has come into my house, do not commit this act of folly. 24 “Here is my virgin daughter and his concubine. Please let me bring them out that you may ravish them and do to them whatever you wish. But do not commit such an act of folly against this man.” 25 But the men would not listen to him. So the man seized his concubine and brought her out to them; and they raped her and abused her all night until morning, then let her go at the approach of dawn.

26 As the day began to dawn, the woman came and fell down at the doorway of the man’s house where her master was, until full daylight. 27 When her master arose in the morning and opened the doors of the house and went out to go on his way, then behold, his concubine was lying at the doorway of the house with her hands on the threshold. 28 He said to her, “Get up and let us go,” but there was no answer. Then he placed her on the donkey; and the man arose and went to his home. 29 When he entered his house, he took a knife and laid hold of his concubine and cut her in twelve pieces, limb by limb, and sent her throughout the territory of Israel. 30 All who saw it said, “Nothing like this has ever happened or been seen from the day when the sons of Israel came up from the land of Egypt to this day. Consider it, take counsel and speak up!” 20.1 Then all the sons of Israel from Dan to Beersheba, including the land of Gilead, came out, and the congregation assembled as one man to the LORD at Mizpah.

I don’t claim to be an expert on this, but Darrell managed to explain things in a way that were fit for preaching (even while it was a trial run for himself). I will attempt to share some of that message with you (while definitely paraphrasing and putting into my own words).

A beginning, and hopeful, note from C.S. Lewis in his Reflections on the Pslams:

Where we find difficulty, we may always expect that a discovery awaits us.

This story of the concubine does not make sense by itself. How could something like this appear here? And more importantly, how do we hear God’s love and Good News in this horrible event? This story must be looked at as part of the larger metanarrative, the greater story of Judges. Judges 2:10 states: “All that generation also were gathered to their fathers; and there arose another generation after them who did not know the LORD, nor yet the work which He had done for Israel.” This is a VERY common theme throughout Judges. God lets Israel have its own way, and things get bad. A Judge is raised up to correct things, dies, and things get bad again. Not only does this cycle keep going, but it gets progressively worse. Each time a judge dies, the people disobey in even greater ways. There is degradation in each cycle. Judges 17-21 is the concluding section to Judges and we find two disturbing stories there that illustrate just how bad things have gotten. The first is about the house of Dan who have sold out and given themselves over to worshiping graven images and the second is the story of the concubine. This concluding section of Judges is bracketed with 17:6 and 21:25, both of which say the same thing: In those days Israel had no king and every man did what was right in his own eyes. Both 18:1 and 19.1 also reiterate that Israel had no king. The stories there are about what life becomes like when there is no king, how national life suffers; people just do what is right in their own eyes. 19.24 says, “Here is my virgin daughter and his concubine. Please let me bring them out that you may ravish them and do to them whatever you wish. But do not commit such an act of folly against this man.” That can be literally translated as “do whatever is good in your eyes” linking it back to the previous references. The author also calls these men “worthless fellows” or literally “sons of Belial” meaning sons of darkness or evil, sons of darkness, lords of the night (if you want more of the Hebrew root here, let me know). These men had sunk so low, they were below human, people of death, people of night. The point? When there is no king, no ruler, people do what is right in their own eyes and end up sons of Belial.

Where is the Good News in this? This repetition of “no king… no king… no king…” leaves us longing for a king, and for good reason. Without a king, the people fall. This points to the coming action of God and the raising of a king, a king whose influence is not temporary, one who moves people from sons and daughters of Belial to sons of daughters of light. This story is not prescriptive, but descriptive. This is not how things are supposed to be. We need to look towards the king. Of course, this isn’t fulfilled until Jesus Christ in the New Testament and as we live in the “now, but not yet” Kingdom of God, we will not see the completion of this until His return. This passage reveals Israel’s extraordinary need for a king and their desperation. It is not difficult to map that onto our own current situation with desperation all around us.

This section of Judges is very difficult to handle. I think that Johnson bravely tackled it and was able to deal with it in a healthy way. There is much more that can be done exegetically and hermeneutically that would also provide deeper meaning to this passage. I hope this was a helpful introduction to a difficult subject.

God Bless
-Matt Jones

Categories: Religion, Theology

Christian Carnival CVII

February 1st, 2006 No comments

This week’s Christian Carnival is up over at Attention Span, head over to read all this week’s posts from around the Christian blogosphere at Christian Carnival CVII: A Winter Olympic Preview. I have contributed my post on Warfield and Systematic Theology. You can also visit my Christian Carnival Archive to catch up on previous posts.

Cheers,
-Matt Jones